Business Communication Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Learn about Basics of Communication

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Business Communication Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 1, 29-38 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/108056999906200103

Teaching Field-specific Writing: Results of a WAC Survey

Molly Hill Epstein

Emory University

In a recent survey, faculty in the College of Business Administration at Georgia State University recorded their perceptions of the effectiveness of both undergradu ate and graduate student writing. In general, respondents found students were able to design and present their documents well and to analyze and build common ground with the reader. They were less able to select and organize material, pres ent a plan of action, and express their message clearly. In further comments and follow-up discussions, respondents expressed frustration with their lack of time in class to teach both their areas of expertise and effective writing skills.

"Evaluating written assignments is time consuming, labor-intensive work, and our new faculty work load policy will not encourage the use of written assignments. "

"Writing is a skill that can be taught and we should be doing it. Unfortunately the move to larger class sizes is a disincentive for faculty to assign more written work."


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
E. A. Tuleja and A. M. Greenhalgh
Communicating Across the Curriculum in an Undergraduate Business Program: Management 100--Leadership and Communication in Groups
Business Communication Quarterly, March 1, 2008; 71(1): 27 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
D. R. Russell
Rethinking the Articulation Between Business and Technical Communication and Writing in the Disciplines: Useful Avenues for Teaching and Research
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, July 1, 2007; 21(3): 248 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
S. Seshadri and L. D. Theye
Professionals and Professors: Substance or Style?
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 2000; 63(3): 9 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]