Business Communication Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Learn about Basics of Communication

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Business Communication Quarterly, Vol. 67, No. 4, 443-454 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1080569904271083

Assessing and Enhancing the Basic Writing Skills of Marketing Students

Donald R. Bacon

Elizabeth Scott Anderson

University of Denver

Employers consistently rank communication skills, in particular writing ability, among the most important skills for undergraduate business students to possess. However, improving writing skills, especially with respect to punctuation, grammar, and word choice, often requires substantial teacher time and effort. To assess and improve student writing skills in a time-efficient manner, the authors developed a computer-scored measure of students’ ability to edit for writing mechanics. The authors tested the method with a pretest and posttest design and found that when students were held accountable for improvement (with 5% of the course grade dependent on improvement), there was a significant increase in students’ ability to edit. Without that accountability, improvement did not occur.

Key Words: assessment • writing mechanics • computer grading • Rasch measurement


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
L. Treleaven and R. Voola
Integrating the Development of Graduate Attributes Through Constructive Alignment
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2008; 30(2): 160 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
E. A. Tuleja and A. M. Greenhalgh
Communicating Across the Curriculum in an Undergraduate Business Program: Management 100--Leadership and Communication in Groups
Business Communication Quarterly, March 1, 2008; 71(1): 27 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
V. L. West
Teaching Written Communication Skills in Professional Selling: The Cover Letter
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2006; 28(3): 205 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]