This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Carrithers, D. Articles by Bean, J. C. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Using a Client Memo to Assess Critical Thinking of Finance Majors

Seattle University, dfcarrit{at}seattleu.edu

John C. Bean

Seattle University, jbean{at}seattleu.edu

This article describes a holistic, discourse-based method for assessing the critical thinking skills of undergraduate senior-level finance majors. Rejecting a psychometric assessment approach in which component features of critical thinking are disaggregated, this study is based on a holistic scoring of student memos. Students were asked to recommend and justify a course of action to a lay client facing an ill-structured finance problem. Analysis of student memos reveals critical thinking weaknesses that may be ameliorated by changes in assignments or instructional methods. The memos reveal four kinds of critical thinking problems: (a) failure to address the client's problem, (b) random rather than purposeful application of finance tools and methodologies, (c) inability to translate finance concepts or methods into lay language, and (d) inability to construct rhetorically useful graphics. The curricular implications of this study are discussed.

Key Words: critical thinking • assessment • writing • rubric • finance • learning

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?