Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Business Communication Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Exploratory Study of Listening Practice Relative to Memory Testing and Lecture in Business Administration Courses

Robin T. Peterson

New Mexico State University, ropeters{at}nmsu.edu

This study investigates the combined impact of a memory test and subsequent listening practice in enhancing student listening abilities in collegiate business administration courses. The article reviews relevant literature and describes an exploratory study that was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of this technique with traditional lecture. The inquiry provided evidence of the potential value of memory tests and listening practice as pedagogical tools that promote listening ability.

Key Words: listening • memory testing • learning • experimental

References

  • Alington, D.E., Leaf, R.C., & Monaghan, J.R. (1992). Effects of stimulus color, pattern, and practice on sex differences in mental rotations task performance. Journal of Psychology, 126, 539-553.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Anderson, C.R. (1988). Management skills, functions, and organizational performance. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Baillie, C. (1997). The power test: Its impact on student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 33-48.[CrossRef]
  • Bates, S. (2002). Honesty, empathy cited in effective leadership. HR Magazine, 47, 10-12.
  • Bing, S. (1984). Effects of testing versus review on rote and conceptual learning from prose. Instructional Science, 13, 193-198.[CrossRef]
  • Blais, C., & Kerr, R. (1990). Components of proactive transfer in motor performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 187-193.[CrossRef]
  • Boyatzis, R.E., & Kolb, D.A. (2002). Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning, 33, 5-33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Bradford, B.M., & Peck, M.W., Jr. (1997). Achieving AECC outcomes through the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Journal of Education for Business, 72, 364-368.
  • Brindley, G., & Slatyer, H. (2002). Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment. Language Testing, 19, 369-394.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Campbell, H. (1996). Adventures in teamland. Personnel Journal, 75, 56-59.
  • Cheney, R.S. (2001). Intercultural business communication, international students, and experiential learning. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 90-104.[Free Full Text]
  • Cordell, V.V. (2001). Assessment of an outreach international business planning project as an MBA capstone course. International Journal of Commerce & Management, 11, 111-126.
  • Daly, S.P. (2001). Student-operated Internet businesses: True experiential learning in entrepreneurship and retail management. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 204-215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • DeKeyser, R.M. (1996). Exploring automation processes. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 349-357.[CrossRef]
  • Dennehy, R.F., Sims, R.R., & Collins, H.E. (1998). Debriefing experiential learning exercises: A theoretical and practical guide for success. Journal of Management Education, 22, 9-25.[Abstract]
  • Eisenstein, M. (2005). Test then train. T+D, 59(5), 26-28.
  • Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgard, A., & Sharma, D.D. (1997). Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 337-360.[CrossRef]
  • Faria, A., & Wensley, R. (2002). In search of interfirm management in supply chains: Recognizing contradictions of language and power by listening. Journal of Business Research, 55, 603-610.[CrossRef]
  • Fraser, L., Harich, H., Norby, J., Brzovic, K., Rizkallah T., & Loewy, D. (2005). Diagnostic and value-added assessment of business writing. Business Communication Quarterly, 68, 290-305.[Abstract]
  • Frensch, P.A. (1991). Transfer of composed knowledge in a multistep serial task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 997-1016.
  • Granger, M., & Neal, N.C. (2002). The dialogic case method: Building a microworld in the classroom. Organization Development Journal, 20(2), 31-41.
  • Gustafsson, C. (2005). Trust as an instance of asymmetrical reciprocity: An ethics perspective on corporate brand management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14, 142-150.[CrossRef]
  • Hamilton, B. (1996). Using accelerated reader with ESL students. MultiMedia Schools, 4, 50-52.
  • Hasebrook, J.P., & Gremm, M. (1999). Multimedia for vocational guidance: Effects of individualized testing, videos, and photography on acceptance and recall. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 377-400.
  • Hayes, J. (1981). Preparing future leaders. Management Review, 16(7), 2-3.
  • Hird, J.S., Landers, D.M., Thomas, J.R., & Horan, J.J. (1991). Physical practice is superior to mental practice in enhancing cognitive and motor task performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13, 281-293.
  • Jonassen, D.H., & Cole, P. (1993). Learner-generated vs. instructor-provided analysis of semantic relationships. In J. Scheer (Ed.), Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology sponsored by the Research and Theory Division (pp. 217-236). Austin, TX: Argon. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED362170)
  • Kayes, A.B., Kayes, C.D., & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Experiential learning in teams. Simulation & Gaming, 36, 330-354.[Abstract]
  • Kenworthy-U'Ren, A. (2005). Toward a scholarship of engagement: A dialogue between Andy van de Ven and Edward Zlotkowski. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 355-362.
  • Kezbom, D.S. (2002). A personal viewpoint... Managing assertively: Listening for better professional relations. Cost Engineering, 44, 11-13.
  • Kim, P.H. (1997). When what you know can hurt you: A study of experiential effects on group discussion and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 165-277.[CrossRef]
  • Koberstein, W. (2001). Transparent moment. Pharmaceutical Executive, 21(11), 14-16.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Making sense of frequency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 275-285.[CrossRef]
  • Leonard, D. (2002). The limitations of listening. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 93-95.
  • Lopez, T.B., & Lee, R.G. (2005). Five principles for workable client-based projects: Lessons from the trenches. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 172-188.[Abstract]
  • Ma, X. (1995). The effect of informal oral testing frequency upon mathematics learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 30(2), 17-20.
  • Memon, A., & Bartlett, J. (2002). The effects of verbalization on face recognition in young and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 635-650.[CrossRef]
  • Messer, D. (1996). Development without learning? Educational Psychology, 16, 5-19.[CrossRef]
  • Moore, K. (2005). Become a better communicator by keeping your mouth shut. Journal for Quality & Participation, 28, 8-10.
  • O'Hara, B.S., & Shaffer, T.R. (1995). Details and student perceptions of an experiential program for personal selling and purchasing classes. Journal of Marketing Education, 17, 41-49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Peterson, R.T. (1993). The listening lab: How to harness the power of listening. Personal Selling Power, 13, 54-55.
  • Petkus, E., Jr. (2000). A theoretical and practical framework for service learning in marketing: Kolb's experiential learning cycle. Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 64-70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Ray, C.M., Hunt, J.B., & Steven, C. (1994). Listening for effectiveness. Journal of Education for Business, 69, 140-144.
  • Rehder, B., & Hoffman, A.B. (2005). Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 1041.
  • Rocklin, C. (1987). Diagnosing the training situation: Matching instructional techniques with learning outcomes and environments. San Diego, CA: University Associates.
  • Sandow, D., & Allen, A.M. (2005). The nature of social collaboration: How work really gets done. Reflections, 6, 1-4.[Free Full Text]
  • Specht, L.B., & Sandlin, P.K. (1991). The difference effects of experiential learning activities and traditional lecture classes in accounting. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 196-210.[Abstract]
  • Stawitz, B.M. (1989). The effects of testing on science process skill achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 659-664.[CrossRef]
  • Stevenson, D. (1996). The pragmatic model and reciprocal efficacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 10, 118-124.
  • Teach, R.D., & Govahi, G. (1993). The role of classroom techniques in teaching management skills. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 429-445.[Abstract]
  • Ulwick, A. (2002). Turn consumer input into innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(2), 91-97.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Van Eynde, D.F., & Spencer, R.W. (1988). Lecture versus experiential learning: Their differential effects on long term memory. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 12(2), 52-58.
  • Walters, J. (2005). Fostering a culture of deep inquiry and listening. Journal for Quality & Participation, 28(14), 4-7.
  • Whiteley, T.R., & Faria, A.J. (1989). A study of the relationship between student final exam performance and simulation game participation. Simulation & Gaming, 20, 44-64.[CrossRef]
  • Ye, K.Q., & Hamada, M. (2000). Critical values of the Lenth method for unreplicated factorial designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 32, 57-66.

Business Communication Quarterly, Vol. 70, No. 3, 285-300 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1080569907305075
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?